Faster Backups with Gzip / Brotli Compression in Email Archiving
Reduce storage costs and accelerate backups with Gzip and Brotli compression in email archiving, improving backup speeds, reducing bandwidth usage, and enhancing compliance capabilities.

Introduction
Organizations handle large volumes of email—everyday correspondence, legal, compliance, transactional, internal memos—all of which may need to be archived, retained, audited, or retrieved later. The storage, backup, retrieval, and compliance burden can grow quickly. One effective tool in reducing cost, improving speed, and optimizing bandwidth is the use of compression—especially modern, high efficiency compressors such as Gzip and Brotli.
What are Gzip and Brotli?
Before diving into backup impact, we need to understand the compression algorithms.
-
Gzip: A widely used compression utility using DEFLATE (combining LZ77 and Huffman coding). It is mature, well supported, generally fast in compression / decompression, and implemented in many operating systems, storage systems, and backup workflows.
-
Brotli: Developed by Google, Brotli is a more modern, lossless compression algorithm that often gives better compression ratios (i.e. smaller compressed size) than Gzip, though sometimes at the cost of higher CPU / memory during compression (especially at higher compression levels). However its decompression speed tends to be fast and well-optimized.
In summary: Gzip is well-known, fast, reliable; Brotli potentially gives better storage savings especially when compressing larger, repetitive text data.
Use Case: Faster Backups
Problem Statement
Organizations using email journaling / mail archiving need to back up the archived data, replicate it for disaster recovery, possibly replicate across regions, or move backups to cold storage. Uncompressed archives are large, consume more disk space, take longer to transmit over networks, and increase backup windows (i.e., the time period during which backup processes run, possibly during off-hours but nonetheless consuming time).
These challenges include:
- Storage cost: More disk or cloud storage needed.
- Transmission bandwidth cost: Backing up across network (on-premises ↔ cloud, cross-region, etc.) consumes bandwidth; costs may be metered.
- Backup windows & speed: Longer to copy, package, compress (if done after backup), verify.
- Restore times: Larger backups can delay restore operations.
How Compression Helps
By applying compression (Gzip or Brotli) to stored email archives and backup files:
-
Reduced file size: Compressed archives are smaller—often significantly so for textual content (email text, headers, metadata). Compression ratios depend on content and algorithm, but Brotli tends to do particularly well. This means that any snapshot, archive or backup consumes less on-disk space.
-
Faster backups: Smaller data to read/write and transmit means backups complete more quickly. For example, fewer bytes to upload to cloud storage or fewer bytes to copy to backup media.
-
Lower bandwidth usage: Transmission (over WANs, between data centers, to cold storage / archiving locations) uses less data, reducing cost and reducing potential network congestion.
-
Quicker restores / retrieves: When you need to restore or retrieve archived emails (for e-discovery, legal, or internal investigation), smaller compressed backups can be transferred / mounted more quickly, decompressing on the fly or in batches.
-
Efficient cold storage: If the archiving system retains multiple snapshots, versions, or long retention periods, compressed backups reduce storage cost, especially in colder, less frequently accessed tiers.
Integration with Creodata's Mail Journaling
If Creodata's Mail Journaling SaaS offers or adds support for compressing stored email archives using Gzip or Brotli, here's how it might work in practice:
- As emails are journaled (captured) from Microsoft 365, before writing to cold or archival storage, the data (email body, metadata) is compressed. Optionally attachments may be compressed if uncompressed (depending on file format).
- Compression could be done in blocks / batches (e.g. daily archives) or streaming (real-time journaling + buffering).
- For retrieval / search / restore, the system would decompress as needed (either decompress whole buckets or stream decompress specific items).
- Backup snapshots of the compressed store are smaller, meaning faster backups, lower storage and transfer costs.
- The system might allow choosing "compression level" or "algorithm" depending on priorities (e.g. faster compression or smaller size).
Advantages for Creodata and its Customers
-
Lower storage costs for both Creodata (if absorbing some costs) and customers. Since storage in cloud is charged per GB, every percent saved helps.
-
Faster backup and replication windows, improving performance and reducing maintenance windows.
-
Reduced bandwidth and networking costs: less data to move; especially important for large organizations with many mailboxes or large attachments.
-
Enhanced compliance & retention capability: enabling longer retention periods without linear growth in cost.
-
Better performance in e-discovery / litigation support: compressed store with indexed metadata can still allow fast searches; fewer delays retrieving older communications.
-
Competitive positioning: offering compressed backups / archives can be a differentiator (lower TCO, faster service) versus rivals.
-
Scalability: handling more mailboxes/users while keeping operational costs manageable.
-
Improved environmental footprint: less storage, less network, less energy consumption in storage and transfer.
Target Audience
Who will benefit most from a service offering compressed archives (Gzip/Brotli) for email journaling / archiving?
1. Enterprises / Large Organizations
Those that generate large volumes of email (many employees, many departments, heavy usage, many attachments). The storage + backup costs for them are large, so compression yields big savings.
2. Regulated Industries
Financial services, legal, healthcare, government, utilities etc. where retention periods are long, compliance rules strict, e-discovery common. These organizations need both secure archiving and cost efficiency.
3. Legal / Compliance Teams
For matters of audit, regulatory requests, litigation holds. These teams require that archives are retained, indexed, and retrievable—compression must not hinder legal discovery.
4. IT / Operations Teams
Those responsible for backup windows, storage provisioning, replication, disaster recovery. They benefit from less resource usage, quicker backups, fewer delays.
5. Cost-Conscious Organizations
SMEs or mid-sized companies that want enterprise capabilities but need to manage their cloud/storage spend carefully. Compression helps keep costs manageable.
6. Remote / Distributed Organizations
Entities with multiple locations, possibly with limited network bandwidth between sites, or with remote offices backing up data over slower or metered links. Reduced bandwidth usage helps.
7. Cloud-first or Hybrid IT Environments
Organizations using cloud storage (e.g. Azure) or hybrid setups where archives are stored partly on-premises, partly in cloud. Compressed backups move more efficiently between these layers.
8. Disaster Recovery / Business Continuity Planners
Since smaller backups mean faster restores in disasters; ensuring business continuity is improved.
9. Service Providers / Managed Service Providers (MSPs)
Those who offer archiving / retention services to multiple clients; savings in storage and backup for each client accumulate.
Conclusion
Compression—especially via efficient algorithms like Gzip or Brotli—is a powerful feature to include in email journaling / archiving systems. It directly contributes to faster backups, reduced storage cost, lower bandwidth use, and more efficient data management, while supporting compliance, legal discovery, and operational continuity.
Creodata's Mail Journaling SaaS already delivers strong capabilities in secure, compliant archiving of Microsoft 365 email. If it supports or adds Gzip/Brotli compressed archives, this would enhance performance, cost control, and scalability even more. Organizations in regulated sectors, with large email volumes, seeking cost efficiency, or those that demand rapid retrieval and legal readiness are those that gain the most.
For more information, visit Creodata.com
